So I guess as Victoria suggests, it is a low memory problem. No I am not do a lot spot or brush adjust, I just use some preset and some basic, detail, lens correction. Found solution for me. Disabling the "write data to. Seems to be working fast again. I tried all other performance enhancing tricks - nothing worked.
If this is it I am thrilled. Was already thinking of changing to a different program! That's great to hear. Are you using external drives by any chance Luk? Or lots of brush strokes? Worth a shot! Click to expand Last edited: Feb 11, Brad Snyder Senior Member. Well, we hate to see you go, but we understand. Your experience is not unique, but fortunately, neither is it pervasive.
There just seem to be some as-yet unidentified systemic idiosyncrasies which cause widely varying performance experience on roughly equivalent platforms.
I'm sure that at least some of us would be interested in hearing your Capture 1 experiences, if you care to share. Best of luck If I Unistall Lightroom 4. Brad Snyder said:. You might also like to try the new Lightroom 5 beta, as there are some noticeable performance improvements. I did try lightroom 5 beta on my old system dual core 2. Victoria Bampton said:. About 1 month to try out Lightroom 5 beta, I don't have any problem with basic edit like I did on LR 4.
Keep to use spot remove or brush you need to restart your computer. I still keep LR 4. This is likely an issue at our end, but it could be that you're not connected to the internet.
Please check your internet connection and then try again later. Lightroom crashes on launch while trying to initialize Enhance Details. Capture time of Photo Merge is not correct, if the capture time of source images has been edited.
Setting a title for web gallery in Lightroom changes the album name and does not update the title of the web gallery in Lightroom web. Applying Enhance Details on an image results in a black image. Scrolling thorough a grid is very slow on macOS after upgrading to Mojave. Fixed issues with video cache. February release version 2. Loss of Creative Cloud license when there is weak or no internet connection.
Search folder and album names with auto-complete search suggestions Identify ad-hoc images Windows only Right click one of the sliders in Local Adjustment Tools throws an error message Nikon Z6 raw files are rendered incorrectly with a magenta color in White Balance The cover photo of named People cluster loses face information after migration from Lightroom Classic. November release version 2.
Fixed an issue that caused the app to crash repeatedly at launch. October release version 2. Manual Lens distortion corrections do not Copy and Paste Lightroom detects image scans with the same filename as duplicates Left and Right arrow keys not working within the Stack filmstrip Applied filters are reset when you move to a different album Legacy profiles group not appearing in the Profile Browser when enabled under Manage Profiles.
Lightroom for mobile iOS and Android. March release version 6. August release versions 5. Android Photos that are taken with Lightroom for mobile do not sync with Lightroom Classic. November release versions 5. September releases versions 4. I'll report back after my next shoot this afternoon, until then I'm cautiously optimistic. It does not work for my system. Specifically the Develop Mod, redraws are delayed, attempts to move sliders are some times not recognized they don't move or at times make jumps back to where they started?!
I Talked with a tech at Adobe and was told to build my previews at 1to1, what a waste of time and no improvement in overall functionality with that as well. All of my cores show usage. I wonder if there is GPU issues at hand in this.
If Adobe is trying to speed things up through the GPU and it just isn't working. Still want to work towards a solution Different systems has different issues, but if it's not an Lr dependent file e.
Lightroom doesn't use GPU acceleration. Hi all, We have put together a technote containing several suggestions for optimizing Lightroom's performance that we hope will help. Hi Peter, I would like to report that the responsive of LR has been improved in the 4. As long as I limit the 4.
As soon as I elect to press F11 to have my 2 monitor show only thumbs grid view , LR is no longer stable and experience random crashes. You don't define what "slow" means, so your report is not very useful. You don't say if you are running the latest release of Lr 4 or not. There are also a lot of things you can try upon first upgrading from 3 that addresses many issues. Finally, the great majority of users did not have a problem at all with the upgrade.
So, I know you probably just wanted to vent, but you are doing your students a disservice by suggesting that somehow Lr 4. Because, quite simply, it is not. All I am reading are opinions not facts. I posted in another thread where using the developer tab and changing the exposure tab causes only one of my eight CPUs to light up. I have LR cat running on a solid state drive, the photos on a solid state drive, on a i7 chip with 16GB ram, a 1 gb video card.
Please advise, I am a hard-core windows guy who can run stack traces if you need help. I think most people with any clues have already shot their wads. Consider looking at some of the other threads about it too, on this and U2U forum.
I can confirm that on my Win7 bit system also most lightroom actions only use a single thread of my CPU. I have a quad core CPU and its resources are not utilized by Lightroom. Usually Lightroom prefers to give me the "not responding" freeze rather than starting to use a second thread. Not to minimize what you say but there is something more going on here. Does anyone have a substandard performing machine that is using an iK like I am?
I would love to compare some things. Christian, if you go to your Windows task manager, hit the processes tab and then right click on Lightroom and choose Set Affinity The thirty-day trial is available to all who might have a concern about Lightroom's reported speed issues on a minority of machines. Download the trial of 4. The thirty-day trial recommendation is a good one - I wish I had done that with my upgrade months ago as i have also found 4.
In short, i would not have paid for the upgrade knowing what I do now. This has been very disappointing as I have been a great fan of LR since its inception until this experience. Try before buying!
I have this issue - Slow means when I try to use crop, spot removal, red eye, gradient, brush. This makes LR nearly unusable. I am on an Asus g73 and I have upgraded the to two - g never more than half full hard drives and 16g ram. The only way to get LR to behave is to run on only 3 cores avoiding Hyperthreading. Seems as if the only people who have this problem are on high end systems. If you want to blast this guy for reporting a problem do a google search. I feel like I paid for a beta product.
Lightroom 4. I've tried all the suggestions, I have a relatively small catalog 39k images. The slowness for me is whenever I click on Develop or try to switch back and forth between images. Any time I attempt to make a change to metadata, anytime I attempt to crop. Anytime I attempt to make corrections. There is an immediate lag. Machine is i 3. Nvidia GTX ti graphic card.
Plenty or hard drive space available on the SSD and the hard drives. Cache is set appropriately. All Lag experienced is after previews have been built LR3 was smokin fast for me, never had this issue. I had nothing but issues with converting the catalog.
Went through the patches and now current release. While things have improved, the lag is aggravatingly slow and still needs to be fixed. I've reported in the other forum referenced above as well. Dear John, Perhaps the definition of slow is best expressed by both Paul and Lance above.
I would point out to you that even the least expensive discount laptop from online stores such as Tiger Direct, is faster and bundled with more RAM than most computers of only a few years ago. LR 4 should run as fast, or faster, on these new generation computers than LR 3, regardless. Users should not be required to find work-around solutions of any kind. I find it interesting that you have directed me to a forum, begun 3 months ago, in which users such as Paul and Lance have expressed their frustration with LR 4.
Rather than accusing professional photographers such as myself, who have been using LR since version 1, and Photoshop since almost the beginning, of whining. Instead, why don't you reassure us that Adobe is aware of the problem and working to fix it?
Something like, "We've sacked the last lot of programmers and the new lot is working around the clock to fix the problem. Most of the people having trouble with LR 4 have said that LR 4. The remainder need to contribute something useful beyond complaining like, perhaps, reporting what is slow, how slow, on what type of system, using which OS, using what preferences and settings, and so on depending on what the problem might be.
Most of us aren't having problems and if Adobe is also not having problems on any of their test systems, they're unlikely to be able to fix anything. There's still room for improvement but I've processed over 15, images on LR4 so far so it's quite far from any sort of unusable, and that's with four different Win 7 systems 1 bit and 3 bit. As a 25 year IT vet, I am left with what exactly does the team need to know? I think we can all agree that 2 seconds to update a change on the slider on-screen is too long on a i7 16GB with a graphics card with SSD storing the photos.
Ok, now they have something to look at for my 64 bit windows, 64 bit LR 4. Rob, just checking, are you the same guy I've been talking to, who is running Windows 8, or not?
When you say you've upgraded, was LR3 running well on that same OS and hardware? Yes and yes. I figured out if you launch. I checked all the cpus available and my problem is significantly improved. Did you do it Rob, if not then? Well, Jay, I am glad to hear that you are not experiencing a problem.
Perhaps you would be better served spending your time creating new images than dissing photographers who are experiencing one. What I'm trying to do is get people that are to report some useful information to Adobe so they have something to go on so that you'll eventually get a fix.
Thank you, Lee. I have the same problems. I tried even Aftershot Pro: Lightning fast with no lags. I can bring LR4.
0コメント